Ms Fs X Standard And Gold Difference

The winding roads of the "infoxication" metaphysical

This morning I had breakfast with a prominent headline in El País - The Vatican says that the pill causes pollution and male infertility - that reflexively, has warned all my defenses - "Does the Vatican? Again in this quagmire? Is it a thing of the Pope? Do not take the most important things to deal with, as the economic crisis or invasion of Gaza? "- but a flicker of hope has reminded me that it was the country where the undisputed quality information has not solved that irrational anti-clericalism tic appears to be part of the identity of the medium.

So, with some prevention, continue reading. Already in the intro is guessed that the Vatican's statement did not come from the Pope's statements, or an encyclical or pastoral letter, even nobody in the curia, but a modest article "English doctor Jose Maria Simon Castellvi." But before I had time to breathe easy - "the Country again! ..."- Never learn the journalist returns insistently the bottom of the holder:

The Vatican has once again lash out with contraceptive methods and ensures that the pill has devastating consequences for the environment and is one of the causes of male infertility ...

And finally, since the middle of the text, I am able to mend the situation:

In an article published Saturday, the English José María Simón Castellvi, President of the International Federation of Catholic Medical Associations (FIAMC), said that oral contraceptives, commonly known as "the pill" may have an abortifacient and are devastating to the environment, as through urine released tons of hormones.

Well, I'm more calm. But information is not a doctor, is not very fond of oral contraceptives in half Vatican. Seems biased and irrelevant. I guess this doctor will have taken an objective fact and you've been reviewing your site, incorporating its ideological harvest, a good dose of fear mongering - "a through urine hormone releasing tons ..."-.

And he wants the chance that the following means to me is office Trends 21, in which "strangely"-has long since stopped believing in coincidences, you see a headline that reminded me of the above information (go you know why): The pill can cause birth defects in wildlife . The brief article echoes the finding of researchers at the University of Idaho on serious genetic damage caused by the 17a-ethinyl estradiol, synthetic estrogen used in birth control pills and reaching nature through human urine, in the sort of rainbow trout.

already it is becoming clearer to me, but I preferred to go to the website of the University of Idaho, to establish their own version. And there, under a headline rather less apocalyptic than the Country - Flushing Toilets How Can Cause Genetic Defects in Wildlife - explained that several years ago that water was found contaminated with 17a-ethinylestradiol damaged trout populations rainbow, and now they had discovered the mechanisms of this action, which just published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . The trout that have come into contact with contaminated water may have trisomy, an abnormal number of chromosomes. This condition is frequently found in cancer cells, causes Down syndrome in humans and in the case of trout, produces a dramatic reduction in survival of embryos of this species, which rose from 95% in half, in waters contaminated.

James Nagler, director of research, explains that the 17a-ethinyl estradiol is very difficult to remove in the treatment plants, so that finally happens to the environment. Nagler added that this research opens the interest in many other synthetic estrogen, 17a-ethinylestradiol besides, found in detergents, pesticides and other products daily, and can affect animals that use contaminated water, including humans. So

behind the screaming headline " The Vatican says that the pill causes pollution and male infertility " lies a modest, almost eschatological wastewater How can cause birth defects in wildlife . This interests first amplified by the bias "anticontrol birth" of a physician and then by the anticlerical bias of the country. As an exercise of toxicity information, is not bad.

Kathy Lee Gifford Exc

A flash in the New Year concert

Yes, I like to start the year listening to the concert of the Vienna Philharmonic . And I recognize that more than once he "directed" the orchestra of the screen, watching, yes, the conductor's baton on duty. Some music portrays a fascinating plasticity-Karajan-era paradigm and is a spectacle in itself. But this year the concert was provided by Daniel Barenboim , whose way of wearing the band, the more passive the more intense the tempo composition, managed get confused from the start. Consequently, when the orchestra struck up a polka, Barenboim was holding his baton and kept an almost static just checking some entries and final. However, when it was the turn of the delicate waltz by Joseph Strauss "The sound of the spheres" - Sphärenklänge - Barenboim turned to a detailed phrasing, following the compass and guiding every gesture of the musicians, to give the impression that overact.

The last straw was when he "Under Thunder and Lightning" - Unter Donner und Blitz - whose frenetic pace prevents static. How can you lead this polka-slow, no more statements that mark the beginning? Suddenly, a nervous little gesture his right foot was visibly beat while keeping the rest of the body rigidity to the orchestra gave me the key. I suddenly realized that Barenboim was forced passivity, a real action to demonstrate their mastery stage. Barenboim movements did not respond to the dynamism of the composition, but the difficulty presented to the musicians. So I could attack a polka without moving, so he could direct the Radetsky March looking exclusively to the public. But given the complexity of Sphärenklänge had no choice but to follow with zeal each bar.

A great director in the orchestra and in life, not the one who needs to make every move with his team, but who achieved maximum results with minimal gestures. In other words, a great director would not need to go down to the details, and it would be sufficient, if anything, to mark the beginning and end. That economy of gestures is proportional to its authority, so that an omnipotent director should hardly anything for all take place, whether it is a classical melody of the very symphony of creation.

not exaggerating. A powerful director would be dispatched the symphony of creation with a complete theory of everything capable of explaining the initial singularity that would eventually unfold in stars, planets, forests and mosquitoes. In fact, particle physicists, but try to escape the idea of \u200b\u200ba great director, creator of the universe, strive to achieve a primary synthesis can encompass a minimum orders in all creation. For now, cosmologists have taken his synthesis of four fundamental forces and three families of particles, convinced that a universe with these few rules would eventually be deployed to create something as complex as the human mind or as subtle as a waltz. But still see too much complexity in this model. Should not there be a single fundamental interaction that unfold gradually gave rise to everything we know?

In fact, some physicists say the LHC is a time machine, it will approach the Big Bang, the universe at time zero. Not be easy, because the approach is asymptotic, with a difficulty that grows exponentially as we approach the initial instant. But we could go, mentally, of course, a little beyond that point. What order was necessary so that the entire symphony was put in place? Who gave it? In fact, LHC physicists are unwittingly modern theologians of our time. Because when you achieve the great unification theory of everything, the initial picture of the beginning of the universe initial wonder, inevitably, by the author of that minimal instruction leading to a set of processes leading chains in this first morning of 2009, this beautiful Sphärenklänge .