Look I'm sorry. In my previous post unconditionally praised what I interpreted as a return to sanity (or objectivity, perhaps) of a medium such as ABC in connection with CLD, but unfortunately today's editorial in this newspaper takes the boring mantra always visceral and scurfy. I'm not regular reader of ABC, but I have followed with sympathy the trip downtown with so much effort undertook the previous director, José Antonio Zarzalejos, that although it was a big loss of readers, it also generated a net gain in terms of journalistic ethics , information quality and credibility. Does
editorial in ABC or mere opportunism? Why can not believe that the editorial a few days ago stated that "if something fails education in Spain, above even the content learning is the transmission civic and moral values \u200b\u200b, charge now against a course which aims to train those same values. Surprised that the editorial today welcomes the announcement of "exemption of the subject [EPC] to all objectors in the Community of Madrid, and which states, without shame, that" Madrid schoolchildren are to get rid of this ideological indoctrination. "
To make matters worse, the editorial applauds unconditionally recent Court of Justice of Andalusia -" charged are reasonable and legal sense "- that was the reason some parents objectors . But give this information isolated, with a strong bias, and omission, amazing, two very important events. First, before sentencing occurred TSJA the other, the last in Asturias, in the opposite direction. Second, TSJA Case has a lot of discomfort in areas of law, both in the courtroom as the Supreme Andalusian. Why? On the one hand, it has issued a ruling on the objection to EPC without submitting to the full Board, as would correspond to an issue of such social impact. Furthermore, the rapporteur of the Judgement of TSJA is precisely the son of the honorary president of Family Forum, an organization that has spearheaded the movement of objection against EpC and, moreover, has provided free legal support to parents objectors. Did not notice a smell of decay?
justice must not only be honest, but also, it seems. Apart from the legal validity of the judicial decision TSJA, I can not discuss, it is doubtful that this failure had occurred in the case of a challenge, more than justified, the rapporteur, or reasonable step for the full. That is, the vaunted award has not cleaned wheat, or it seems. Its success is based on the failure of the basic controls of the prosecution and tainted as it is, should not establish jurisprudence, lacking, in my opinion, of sufficient ethical authority.
0 comments:
Post a Comment